Mass-Debating Friday, Oct 3 2008 

It was an interesting night in North American politics on Thursday. Not only did the Comedy Network, I mean CNN, air the Vice-Presidential debate, but the CBC aired the english debates for our federal election. A shit show on both sides of the 49th but a tad more on the southern side. I’m going to try my best to not make this a rant but there’s a 99% chance that it will be so fuck it, I’m bloggin’.
I would like to think that Canadians were tuned into the CBC but I doubt it very much. The hype surrounding the U.S. election is, surprise surprise, leaking north onto our televisions. But my god, do those Yanks know how to hype this crap up. It was ‘Debate Night in America’, a cheesy title pawned from ‘Football Night in America’ or ‘Hockey Night in Canada’ for us hosers. The stage was glorious with enough red, white, and blue to give Uncle Sam a wet dream. CNN busted out the flashiest of flashy graphics for the great debate. And in the end, did the U.S. learn anything besides the way Palin could compose herself?
CNN continues to blow my mind. They had 11 [insert swear word]s and one Anderson Cooper packed into one Situation Room to analyze the VICE-Presidential debate. And what did they talk about? CNN
Huh? I know it’s the Vice-Presidential debate but come on. Debates make sense to people who follow politics on a regular basis but what percent of the U.S. is that? This is an important vote for the people of the U.S. but you gotta figure that average joe’s are sitting there, TRYING to paint themselves a better picture of which party to vote for, and CNN is off chatting about how Palin could rebound from the Katie Couric beat down. Does this really educate anyone? I mean, they all had their laptops open and crammed onto the desk, google some shit and enlighten me.
American politics are all about the image and they’re going to continue to have out-of-touch citizens until they try to get-in-touch with their citizens. Everyone knows Sarah Palin is not cut out to be the president of the former most powerful nation in the world. She’s real and that’s a good thing but when you’re real and as uninformed as the citizens you wink at through the television, you’re cut.
Compare that hype to what you saw with our debates. They sat around a table, beat the snot out of Harper, and talked about real issues. Maybe you could argue that this debate was a real debate, unlike the Vice-Presidential debates that really don’t mean much, but they carried the same tone. Attack, attack, attack.
And after all the political jargon that also made no sense to me, the CBC came through. They flipped right to the National and the lead story was a recap of the debate. For the CBC, there was 12 less people than CNN and the reporter actually made sense of the accusations made during the debate. It was educational and I felt proud to be Canadian. It was certainly a big rebound from the gaffe pulled by whatever CBC broadcaster was the moderator. To paraphrase it was something like: “Great debate, who needs Palin and Biden?”
All the party leaders looked at him like, “Dude, what the fuck?” Really though, why would you even mention it? It reminded me to hit flashback on my remote to check out what was going on.
If anything though, compare the two broadcasts and be thankful to be Canadian. We have so little to hold on to that doesn’t come from beyond our borders that we forget how real our nation is. Real in the sense that we don’t rely on approval ratings during our debates, flashy graphics, 12 assholes sitting around a table analyzing feelings, and a shitload of make-up. Honestly, Crest is short on white strips and Revlon is out of cover-up because the the vice-presidential debate. Finally an appropriate image!

-JF

Rathergate Monday, Sep 22 2008 

I’ve always wondered about blogs.  How credible are they compared to your normal sources of news?  It’s a tough complex to grasp for a journalism student.  On one side, you like the freedom of blogs.  Writing is much easier because it’s not as robotic as writing for print.  On the other hand, the medium is the internet and there is so much junk to sift through that it’s hard to distinguish between what’s real and what’s not.  

Distinguishing between what’s real and what’s not real was the problem for CBS and Dan Rather.  It has also opened my eyes to the validity that a blog post can contain. Rathergate.com is an excellent example of how to use a blog to it’s full capabilities. The whole scandal that was directed at George W. Bush’s military history was quickly turned over to Dan Rather. CBS and Rather obtained documents that showed Bush got off easy from military service. It was right before Bush’s election into his second term and CBS ran with the story exclusively. The documents turned out to be fake and not only has it cost Rather his job and ultimately, his legacy, it has also fired up many online journalists or whatever you want to call yourselves.

The whole circus regarding these documents has brought up many relevant questions. The most important one to me is can we still trust news? If Dan Rather, one of the most respected investigative reporters of this era, can use fake documents, who do I trust? Rathergate.com has transcended from sorting out the whole Rather-Bush mess to keeping journalists honest today, specifically, the whole Sarah Palin mess. This is exactly what the doctor ordered for our neighbours to the south.

The Americans need somewhere like rathergate.com to go to sift through the crap. Americans are spoon-fed ideologies and ‘sexy’ news all day and night and topics that used to be reserved for places like the internet are being delivered to them in their living rooms. Too many talking heads whose theories are leaking from the corporate sponsors. A mess that has left Americans asking, ‘wtf are the facts?’

Facts are all a journalist has to work with and facts are all they should stick with. Journalism is a slippery slope and the whole mess that was Dan Rather’s curtain call is a reminder of this point. More situations like the one faced by Rather are surely to come up, but it is important to remember that news doesn’t have to be exclusive or breaking. News is real and it’s unfortunate that ratings sometimes dictate what to lead with or simply what to cover. Profit is as real as news but it’s important to have that outside look (rathergate.com) to screw your head on straight again.

-JF-

Chalk this rant up to irony.. Wednesday, Apr 9 2008 

The future of journalism is one that is clouded with so much uncertainty, especially the print medium.  I’m a supporter of the printed word.  You can’t beat it.  But where the hell is it going?  It’s a question that doesn’t have an answer. 

This technology era we live in is throwing print-lovers into a frenzy.  More newspapers are shifting their efforts towards online publications.  This is something that drives me mental but at the same time, this is one reason why the newspaper will never die.  There’s too much crap on the Internet!  The Internet has morphed into this giant monster that offers everything from porno to the ability to do bank transactions by the click of a mouse.  So is it crap or useful?  It’s both!

Since it’s both, how do you draw the line on what is credible and what is not?  Credibility is the backbone to journalism and it’s hard to say that the Internet is credible.  You can go to a website like cnn.com or the spec.com and you can bet that it’s a credible source but then you have to deal with the pop-up advertisements and scrolling your mouse everytime you finish a couple of paragraphs.  It’s annoying and I feel like I can read one or two paragraphs and then I’m done. 

You know what I say?  @#$% the Internet! 

If journalism is going to survive, I truly don’t believe that the Internet is the stage for it to continue.  I would like to think that Internet news is made for the info-snackers.  They drop in on a website, they graze through some headlines, maybe read a story, and call it a day.  The newspaper is the complete package for people who really care about the whole story, which is the essence of journalism.  We’re taught to cover all angles of a story but who has the time to read an entire story when they’re clicking away and snacking on news? 

The newspaper will never die because of the lunacy, confusion, and junk that spews out from the Internet.  Think of the paper boys!

-JF

Information everywhere.. Friday, Mar 28 2008 

We live in an age where information is one of the easiest things to come by.  Thanks to the Internet, anyone who has a computer can access almost any piece of information imaginable.  The key is sifting through the bullshit to find the facts.  Let’s take a look at how much information you are stacked with in your day.  You wake up in the morning and you might watch the news or read the paper.  There’s a ton of information to ingest.  Then you go to school where you are force fed crucial information and a lot of it.  Then you come home at night and the first thing you do is flip on the television.  The television is for entertainment but you still gather some sort of information from it.  So your only time to really shut down is when you’re sleeping.

I guess you would have to define ‘information’ to figure out how much a human being can withstand.  I feel that I’m learning every minute of every day.  You can be doing nothing but it’s possible that you’re taking in information.  And since there is access to information no matter where you go, why is there so much stress in memorizing this stuff in school?  That’s one of the biggest problems in elementary and secondary schools.  These young kids, some with learning disabilities, are taught to memorize and some just can’t do it.  When test time comes they fail or do poorly.  We get fed this information and then we’re expected to memorize it?  That’s crazy talk because in the real world, there’s no rule that you can’t consult notes. 

I know my brain can only withstand so much.  I can take it in and understand it but as soon as I pack in too much stuff, something just gets swept away.  I think that is pretty normal for most people.  Our brains recycle information and the more you put in, the more that becomes less prominent in your brain.  Although our brains recycle information, I don’t think there is a limit on how much the brain can take in as long as you have a certain sense of curiosity to go along with it.  The cliche – ‘you learn somethin’ everyday’- didn’t come from nowhere.  Did you know that ‘jiffy’ is an actual time unit.  It’s 1/100th of a second.  Information! 

-JF

Your opinion counts.. Monday, Mar 24 2008 

“We know there is a vast morass of information out there that our audiences want us to try to make sense of.  The danger consists in trying to leap above it, not by getting more dramatic or salient or verifiable facts, but by analyzing, speculating, predicting, interpreting – by drawing definitive conclusions while the bodies are still warm.”    Paul Knox, The Globe and Mail

 This is one of those quotes that reminds us journalists in training of the importance of factual reporting.  Basically it stands as a warning that the analyzing, predicting, speculating, and interpreting is a slippery slope.

This type of reporting is very common in sports.  A bunch of ex-players and coaches will gather on a ‘panel of experts’ to shine some light on the dark corners of the world of sport.  Really it’s just some guy with an opinion that may be no different than the one any average sports fan has, but he played the game so his opinion counts.  I believe that this kind of reporting serves a purpose in the news.  

No matter how much you dig, there are some facts that will remain untouched.  If this were truly a world with access to any information, we wouldn’t live in this cloud of confusion that we do.  Reporting on just the facts can only service the public to a certain degree.  This doesn’t mean that any journalist can put his or her opinion in a report but we use professionals as sources so why can’t we just cut to the chase and use professionals as journalists?  Only sometimes though cause I need a job too.

The good thing about opinion is it provokes thought in someone.  Whether you agree or disagree, there is a much hotter relationship between the journalist and the news consumer if the subject is opinion rather than fact.  Sometimes I feel like a vegetable watching the news and it’s much like being in one of those really boring classes.  You may be listening but you don’t hear it and it’s like your just nodding your head and accepting what is being said rather then analyzing it yourself. 

This should no way undermine the importance of factual reporting but you can certainly generate an educated opinion that is based on fact. 

-JF

 

No more malarky.. Friday, Mar 14 2008 

We were visited by Peggy the Librarian today in our reasearch tecniques class. She presented a powerpoint outlining ‘the Brain’ which is essetially an E-library. It connects students to a load of information on the Internet and it is run by the librarians of Mohawk College. Unfortunately, I slept in and missed the first forty minutes of her presentation. Luckily, she delivered the same presentation to us about four months ago.
I can’t seem to get away from the google and yahoo search engines. They have never failed me in the past so I have never really thought to go outside of the comfort zone. That is, until Peggy came into my life. I still use google and yahoo as my primary search engines but I waste time filtering through the crap before I find what I’m intending to find. Not having to filter through the BS is one benefit of using the Brain.
A search engine like google gives you billions of pages that relate to whatever you typed in for your subject. The brain is much more advanced and specific. You have to put more thought into how you word your search subject and it is not as simple as a search engine like google but it certainly saves the time and stress of sifting through the malarky. Peggy also stressed the importance of using other search engines if you’re not going to use the Brain. Other notable search engines that are worth trying are dogpile and ebsco.
In-depth reasearch is absolutely crucial to succeeding as a journalist. It’s important to cover all angles to a story and that doesn’t just involve sourcing the ying and yang of a story. Researching is the spring board for covering a story properly and the Brain is a huge benefit to us journalists because it offers information that is much more succint. I think that is very important for journalists because we are working with sharp deadlines so it is a benefit to save as much time as possible. It also connects you to all sorts of media electronically. Students have access to media such as books and magazines in electronic form. We live in an Internet era and as much as our teachers stress the importance of not relying on the Internet as a source of information, it continues to evolve to meet the needs of students. The e-library of Mohawk is a reflection of the era we live in and it makes our lives easier by making information accessible on the Internet. I’m definately a supporter for anything that relieves the need to actually go to the library of Mohawk College.

-JF

Copps Coliseum Adventure Thursday, Mar 6 2008 


This is one man’s adventure from the small rink to the big rink.

Friday, Feb 22 2008 

The Lil’ Black Dot.. Wednesday, Feb 13 2008 

I’m a big fan of the show Seinfeld.  I have seen almost every episode about ten times because it remains a staple on many evening television line-ups.  One of the funniest episodes is the one where George buys Elaine a Cashmere sweater for a discounted price because of a little red spot.  She spots it, no pun intended, and calls George out on it which leads George to try and pawn the same sweater off as a gift to the Portugese cleaning lady that he slept with at his office.  Hilarious.  It’s one of those classic ’George’ moments that depict his cheap and weasle-like nature.  I think it can serve as a good reflection of the little black spot on the flower.

In George’s case, although the situation is fictitious, he was trying to present a beautiful gift when it was actually something else.  He’s good friends with Elaine and she felt insulted by receiving this beautiful Cashmere sweater with a little red dot on it.  She was insulted because she’s a person with feelings who received a phony gift from a personal friend.  George’s credibility, although already depleted for comic relief,  takes a huge hit in the eyes of Elaine.  Much like if I were to write a story and take all my my source’s quotes out of context to create this fictitious scenario for a more edgy story, my credibility would be damaged.  

As journalists, we have to find a common ground with our story subjects that is detached but still personal.  I think there is a level of trust that has to be reached through a contact in order to report thoroughly and properly.  When you get that trust from your source, their reputation is in your hands so your head is subject to the chopping block if you report or depict that source in an untruthful manner.  Why?  Because they’re individuals whose reputations, or employer’s reputations, hinge upon how they are viewed in the public eye.  A flower?  Not so much.

Having said that, there is no freakin’ way that removing a little black dot from an image of a flower is going to destroy yours or your publication’s credibility.  The flower can not sue you and it’s easy to say that the flower’s reputation among the flower community will remain intact.  You need good judgement to make a publication that is respected and removing a black dot from a flower is far less damaging than removing or adding something to a person’s face.  This doesn’t mean that if it’s not a person, you can do whatever you want to the image.  All I believe is it’s a flower!  If the headline of the story was: ’The Most Beautiful Flower Ever”, there are two things you should do.  1)  Don’t touch the image because it will damage the context of the story and 2) realize that your publication is crap and fold like a cheap tent because you’re publishing that story.

I hope you see the reflection between George Costanza’s credibility and that of a journalist.  Perhaps I am so obssessed with Seinfeld that the only similarity is a dot.   

-JF

Peddie’s New Puppet Thursday, Jan 24 2008 

Steve Simmons can rest his pen for awhile and the media blitz can end, Richard Peddie and his gang of flunkies have pulled the trigger on John Ferguson Jr. They’ve replaced Ferguson with former Maple Leafs GM Cliff Fletcher on an “interim basis”. The move is very interesting considering that the Maple Leafs went 145-110-10-30 under Ferguson, which is the second best record compared to the other eleven GM’s in Leafs history. I can’t help but think that this is another one of those classic Maple Leaf moves that allows the media to rebuttle and find the next target. The Toronto media’s blood lust is unquenchable.

With the poor play of the Leafs through the first half of the season, someone was getting fired, replaced, or traded. Something had to be done but was the firing of John Ferguson Jr. the right move today? After all, he was just a GM and has no control of how the players perform. He has made it very clear in the past that Paul Maurice, the current Head Coach, has full control of getting the players ready to play. Yet Paul Maurice has been one of the few members of the organization that hasn’t had to worry about his job. Good call.

But the GM? Come on. The general manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs is the middle man and I think John Ferguson did just as good as any other talking head would have. Talking head seems to be the most fitting way to describe the position as they only ‘manage’ with the consent of the MLSE Board of Directors — aka ‘The Dark Side’. Which is exactly how it looked during the press conference for the announcement of Cliff Fletcher as interim GM. Click Here
Watch Peddie’s mouth when Cliff Fletcher makes “his” statement.

It’s eery looking, isn’t it? I find it amazing that Richard Peddie can have his hand so far up Fletcher’s ass and Ol’ Cliff doesn’t even let out a tear or a whimper. This is proof that the GM is nothing more than a patsy to take the fall. It’s unfortunate because Ferguson did go out and get some solid free agents to hopefully propel the team into the post season this year. It’s also unfortunate that the players who got them so close last year have yet to show up this year. One of the reasons the Leafs aren’t the worst team in the league is Vesa Toskala. He has stolen many games for the Leafs this year and Ferguson is the one who brought him to Toronto. That’s a nice complement to the fact that Ferguson leaves the Leafs with the second best record overall as GM. Doesn’t really seem like the epicentre to the Leafs problems this year.

- JF

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.